A trial lawyer's questions aren't "what do I have," they're which items hold up, which move a jury, and what the other side will try. Caseprep reads the whole record and answers in your terms, with every finding cited to the evidence it rests on.
Hundreds of items arrive in discovery, and only a handful decide the case. The work is finding which ones hold up, which carry the jury, and which the other side will challenge first, on a deadline that doesn't move.
Each of these maps directly onto trial preparation, in language a lawyer already uses.
Every item scored on whether it survives challenge, whether it bears on an element, and whether it persuades, with a one-line reason.
Themes that track the charge — identity, the act, the weapon, forensic link, timeline, motive, statements — so you read strength element by element.
For the prosecution, a list of vulnerabilities to shore up. For the defense, the same list is a map of where to attack.
Findings footnoted to specific items, the way a brief cites the record. A defensible, traceable basis for strategy, not an assertion.
These extend what's already here toward the questions a lawyer actually argues.
The case the other side will most likely make, and which items they'll lean on. For the prosecution, the defense's theory and its soft points; for the defense, the prosecution's strongest line. Turns a list of weaknesses into an anticipated strategy.
For a flagged item, the specific challenge — hearsay, foundation, authentication, prejudice versus probative value — and what would cure or counter it. From "this is weak" to "here's why, and here's what to do." Extends the admissibility score already in the tool.
From the flagged items, the pre-trial motions or in-trial objections likely to touch each one, so nothing is a surprise. Preparation support, not a substitute for your own motion practice.
Each element of the charge as a row, with the count and strength of supporting items, so you see which elements are well-covered and which rest on a single fragile piece.
Ties evidence to witnesses — what each can authenticate or speak to — and suggests the points a direct or cross should reach, anchored to specific items. You write the questions.
Flags items potentially favorable to the defense and helps track what has and hasn't been turned over — addressing a real affirmative duty. The highest-stakes feature here, designed slowly and with practicing attorneys; the tool flags candidates, the attorney decides.
Some capabilities are framed for one side and would mislead handed to the other. Offering Caseprep to both is a deliberate decision, not a default.
Find the strong items, shore up the vulnerabilities before the defense reaches them, and meet disclosure obligations with a clear record of what's been turned over.
Map where the State's proof is thin, surface the contradictions and gaps worth pressing, and concentrate doubt on the elements resting on a single fragile item.
Some cases involve sexual or other highly sensitive material that cannot and must not pass through a general commercial AI service. Handling this category is planned as a separate, locally-hosted module that runs inside the office's own controlled environment, kept apart from the standard pathway so this material never leaves the office's control.
Until that module exists, the standard tool is not used for that category of evidence at all. This is a deliberate boundary, stated plainly rather than glossed over.
We will walk you through a working build on a fictional 437-item case: the full record, the scoring by element, and the cited report. Set up a time and we will show you live.